Fire Station Building Advisory Committee

September 19, 2006

Town Hall Annex

                                                                    

Chairman Flanders called the meeting to order at 2000 hours..

 

Committee members present:           Wayne Bredvik

Peter Brothers (Board of Selectmen’s Representative)

                                                                Jason Cornelissen

                                                                Bob Flanders

                                                                Carol Granfield

                                                                David “Bud” Larrabee

                                                                Steve Nedeau

                                                                Chuck Palm         

                                                                Dave Parker

                                                                Carl Smith

                                                                David Sticht

                                                                Karen Sticht

 

Members absent with notice:            Ann Sprague (ex-offical)

                                                               

 

ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES: A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the August 15, 2006 meeting.  K. Sticht, requested that such minutes reflect the fact that even though the conceptual plans or drawings show the future housing of an ambulance, there is no intention to change the medical service provider.  Palm agreed and additionally he had previously discussed this with the owner of Stewarts so they had a “heads up” on the thought process that was transpiring in developing the building requirements. The motion to accept the minutes, with this change, passed unanimously, with Bredvik abstaining due to not being present at that meeting.

 

A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of September 5, 2006.  Being no discussion, the motion passed unanimously, with Bredvik, Larrabee and the Sticht's abstaining due to not being present at that meeting.

 

 

COMMITTEE/CONSTRUCTION PROCESS:  Nedeau initiated a discussion regarding test borings and why this process was delayed in light of the Committee’s previous agreement that this was going to move forward.  After discussion, it was agreed that probably the most cost effective approach for this activity was to delay the test borings.  It is believed that the soils in the area were of a decent quality (unlike both the police station and the original site of the Community Center, which were both being sited on filled land).  There is undoubtly ledge in the area; however, this is not a major obstacle and it would probably be better to have a better idea what the footprint might look like so that the borings can be done in locations requested by the architect and thereby avoid the possibility of having two or more visits by the boring contractor; hence hopefully not having to pay for more than one visit and multiple boring reports.  A motion was made D. Sticht and seconded by K. Sticht to delay the test borings at this time as was suggested.  The motion passed unanimously.

 

It was agreed that the Level 1, asbestos and lead paint studies should proceed currently as these results need to be factored into any construction activity.  It was agreed that Granfield would obtain bids for this work and present the results at a future Committee meeting. 

 

Flanders asked the members as to their input regarding the architectural RFP draft.  Bredvik asked permission to discuss briefly the steps that are often used in designing a building for construction and why he had requested that the wording of the RFP to be changed accordingly.  The first step in the architectural process is the design concept, this is where ideas are placed on paper in the form of footprint layout – how the future building may be situated on the site, etc.  Next are the preliminary designs, during this phase rough sketches of what a building may look like is set forth.  During this stage, detail is limited so that as ideas evolve, changes can be easily made and the future owners can get their ideas to the point where they can see what the finished product may look like.  The next phase is the design development, this is the point where a construction manager becomes involved, providing input to facilitate the development of critical designs and helping make decisions as to alternative building construction choices, etc.  It is at this point where some pretty solid pricing estimates can be developed and there is still ample opportunity to make plan changes.  Once all parties are in agreement, then the detailed final construction plans can be prepared, which is the last step in this process.

 

It was agreed that Bredvik would meet with Palm for the purpose of viewing the fire station and to review the final draft architectural RFP and this final draft will be sent to all members prior to posting it for solicitation.

 

Flanders suggested that the Committee members keep aware of possible locations for storing the fire apparatus, should the present site be deemed not to be adequate due to engineering or physical limitations being discovered during the architectural process. 

 

OTHER:  It was agreed that Palm should try to make arrangements with Alton as a possible station to visit based upon the feeling of the group that they have made a couple of modifications to their existing facilities and their experiences may be of value to the Committee.  Since there was some travel time involved, it was suggested that for the next meeting (October 3rd), we would meet at the Annex at 1830 hours (6:30PM) in lieu of the regular start time. 

  

 

ADJOUNMENT: Flanders, seeing that there was no further business to be brought before the Committee, requested a motion to adjourn.  Motion was made, seconded and passed unanimously.  Meeting was adjourned at 2135 hours.

 

 

Respectfully submitted, C. Palm